Legal Opinion

Nolander v. Butte Valley Irr. Dist.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 31, 1942No. 10139PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decree in a proceeding under Chapter IX of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. §§ 401-404, 11 U.S.C.A. §§ 401-404, for the composition of the indebtedness of the appellee, an irrigation district created under the California Irrigation District Act of the State of California, Cal.Stat.1897, p. 254, as amended, Deering’s General Laws, Act 3854.

A. Appellant contends that the final decree is an interference with the political and governmental duties and powers of the district. Appellant concedes this contention has been decided against him by our…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SlighCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  2. Kustoff v. ChaplinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  3. Decatur Bank v. St. Louis BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Mason v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
  5. Mason v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mason v. Banta Carbona Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
  2. Mason v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API