Legal Opinion
Hill v. Hill
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 4, 1921No. 9805PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Proceeding involving the question of temporary alimony in an action for divorce. Payment ordered. Error to the County Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Ira C. Rothgerber, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whitford
The defendant in error filed her petition for temporary alimony, court costs and attorney fees in the divorce action instituted by her against the plaintiff in error, wherein she charged him with statutory cruelty.
On the hearing of the petition the plaintiff in error set up as a defense and introduced in evidence the following document, which is denominated a property settlement, signed by the defendant in error and formally acknowledged by her before a notary public, to-wit:
*48“Know All men By These Presents, That I, Jessie E. Hill (also known as Jessie May Hill), of the City and County of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ManzoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Hobbs v. HobbsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Marriage of WignerColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Brimble v. SicklerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928