E. A. Strout Farm Agency v. Hosford
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.
The offer of testimony given in a former suit against a third party was put upon the ground that the heir is the real party in interest. Its admissibility is now urged upon the further ground that the present defendant is a privy of the former one. It is evident that this defendant’s decedent was in no way connected with the prior litigation. If she were still alive the present claims would clearly be without foundation. It is not perceived how the facts of her death and the consequent defense by her administrator in a suit against her estate affect the situation. No rights are claimed either…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bohanan v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- Warren v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
- Carpenter v. HatchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
- Morrison v. NooneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
- Flanders v. GreelySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Niemi v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Brownell v. Tide Water Associated Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941