Boston Pipe Covering, Inc. v. Rosati

The petitioner, in seeking relief here under G. L. c. 211, § 3, indicates that it is the defendant in a Superior Court action for monetary damages and that it has taken an appeal from an interlocutory judgment to the Appeals Court. That appeal is reportedly pending. The petitioner states that Rosati and Cro-teau (respondents) have sent to counsel “Plaintiffs’ First Request for Production of Documents in Supplementary Process . . . and . . . First Set of Interrogatories in Supplementary Process.”2 The petitioner contends that the respondents are not entitled to that discovery while the matter…