Legal Opinion

Champagne Louis Roederer, S.A. v. Delicato Vineyards

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 11, 1998No. 98-1032Published

1Opinion of the Court

148 F.3d 1373

47 U.S.P.Q.2d 1459

CHAMPAGNE LOUIS ROEDERER, S.A., Appellant,

v.

DELICATO VINEYARDS, Appellee.

No. 98-1032.

United States Court of Appeals,

Federal Circuit.

July 16, 1998.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 11, 1998.

Julius Rabinowitz, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, of New York City, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was Perla M. Kuhn.

Michael A. Grow, Arent Fox Kinter Plotkin & Kahn, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief was I. Steven Siglin, Jr. of Costa Mesa, California. Of counsel was Cristina A. Carvalho, Arent Fox Kinter Plotkin & Kahn, of Washington, DC.

Before…

Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  3. Yamaha International Corporation v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., Assignee of Hoshino Gakki Ten Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Kenner Parker Toys Inc. v. Rose Art Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  5. Specialty Brands, Inc. v. Coffee Bean Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API