Universal Athletic Sales Company v. Salkeld
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
KNOX, District Judge.
This is an action for copyright infringement claiming that the defendants have copied and are using for commercial purposes certain wall charts and coaches’ training manuals copyrighted by plaintiff illustrating the use of plaintiff’s gymnasium exercising equipment. There is a companion case pending in this court involving patent infringement and unfair competition in connection with the manufacture and sale of equipment at Civil Action No. 71-166. Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction to restrain…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Concord Fabrics, Inc. v. Marcus Brothers Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Blazon, Inc. v. DeLuxe Game Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- McGraw-Hill, Inc. v. Worth Publishers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
- Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Zale CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Universal Athletic Sales Co., a Corporation v. Larry Salkeld Appeal of Donald E. PinchockCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Midway Mfg. Co. v. Bandai-America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Klitzner Industries, Inc. v. H. K. James & Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Testa v. JanssenDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., Defendants- Sid & Marty Krofft Television Productions, Inc. And Sid & Marty Krofft Productions, Inc. v. McDonald Corporation and Needham, Harper & Steers, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.