Legal Opinion
United States v. Cello-Foil Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 22, 1996No. Nos. 94-1419, 94-1568PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, the United States, the Michigan Attorney General and the State of Michigan, appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Defendants Cello-Foil Products, Inc., Clark Equipment Company, General Foods Corporation, and Hoover Universal, Inc., in this action for environmental response costs brought pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). We conclude the district court erred in its application of the arranger liability portion of CERCLA and genuine issues of material fact exist that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Amcast Industrial Corporation and Elkhart Products Corporation v. Detrex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. R.W. Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Deluca, an Infant, by Her Guardian Ad Litem, Deluca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States GypsumDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth Edison Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. Unocal Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
- Cipri v. Bellingham Frozen Foods, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Bonnieview Homeowners Ass'n v. Woodmont Builders, L.L.C.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Armstrong v. Nationwide Mortgage Plan/Trust (In Re Armstrong)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.