Legal Opinion
Siegel v. GENERAL PARTS CORPORATION
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 4, 1983No. 65135PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Judge.
Appellee-plaintiff brought suit against appellant-defendants to recover on an account. The case was heard before the trial court sitting as the trior of fact. Judgment was entered for appellee and appellants appeal.
1. Appellants first assert that the trial court erred in failing to make sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law. Our review of the order in the instant case demonstrates that it complies with the requirements of Code Ann. § 81A-152, notwithstanding the fact that the order does not specify the evidence actually relied upon in making the findings and in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spivey v. MaysonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Don Swann Sales Corp. v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Bhatia v. WEST CASH & CARRY BUILDING MATERIALS OF SAVANNAH, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Bell v. StocksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Frasier v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Glenn McClendon Trucking Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Acker v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Vaughan v. BuiceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Lewis v. RickenbakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Malin Trucking, Inc. v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.