Legal Opinion
Paul v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 2003No. 22A01-0304-CR-138PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRIEDLANDER, Judge.
Steven I. Paul (Paul) brings this interlocutory appeal arising from the trial court's denial of his Motion for Discharge pursuant to Ind.Crim. Rule 4(B)(1). The sole issue presented for review is, did the trial court err in sua sponte declaring an emergency and continuing and rescheduling Paul's trial date?
We affirm.
The facts favorable to the ruling demonstrate that the State charged Paul with the murder of Donald Barnett on November 6, 2002. At Paul's initial hearing on the same day, the trial court scheduled trial for January 13, 20083. On November 26, 2002, Paul…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Biggs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Lowrimore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Marshall v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- McKay v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Patrick Austin v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Truax v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Feuston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Upshaw v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- C.L.Y. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.