Legal Opinion

Dmoch v. Iolab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 7, 1994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, Queens County (Joan Marie Durante, J.), entered December 9, 1991, granting defendants’ motion and cross-motion to dismiss the complaint only to the extent of *60dismissing the first, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eighth and ninth causes of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly dismissed the first, second, third, fourth and fifth causes of action, sounding in medical malpractice/negligence as time barred by the Statute of Limitations (CPLR 214, 214-a). These causes of action failed to allege any facts sufficient to estop defendants from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harkin v. CulletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Board of Managers of the Gramercy Park Habitat Condominium v. ZuckerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Roosa v. Stanley FrankelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ponterio v. KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API