Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haase v. Common Council

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1923Published

1Dissent

Hasbrouck, J. (dissenting):

The difficulty I find in this case is that while the statute declares there shall be a vacancy in the office of a water commissioner who fails to perform his duties for three months, the statute names no authority to declare such vacancy. Perhaps it could be made by the common council appointing a successor. (People ex rel. Ward v. Drake, 43 App. Div. 325.)

Where the statute specifies the existence of an unchallengeable fact as evidence of vacancy the statute is quite self-executing. (Cronin v. Stoddard, 97 N. Y. 274.) Where the fact is doubtful or in dispute the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cronin v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. People ex rel. Ward v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. People ex rel. Town of Oyster Bay v. WoodruffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. People ex rel. Webster v. Van TassellNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  5. People ex rel. Moenig v. Commissioners of the Land OfficeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API