Legal Opinion · Dissent

Russell v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 16, 1969No. 25203Published

1DissentMobley, Justice

Neither the Appellate Practice Act nor the rules of this court requires the enumeration of errors to be filed separately from the brief. Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 29, as amended by Ga. L. 1968, pp. 1072, 1077 (Code Ann. § 6-810), relied upon by the majority, provides in Section 14 that “The appellate court, by rule, may permit such enumeration to be made a part of the brief.” This court has not adopted such a rule, but neither has it adopted one prohibiting this.

The cases cited in the majority opinion do not require a ruling that the enumeration of errors must be filed separately from the brief.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Windsor v. Southeastern Adjusters, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  2. Cagle v. P. M. C. Development Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API