Legal Opinion

Hansel v. De Salle

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1959No. 21322Published

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge pro tern.

The plaintiff, Vernon E. Hansel, filed this suit against Herbert J. DeSalle to recover $694.01, which plaintiff alleged was due under two written contracts entered into between himself and the defendant. One contract obligates defendant to pay plaintiff $529.01 to reimburse plaintiff for the amount of a street paving assessment against a house and lot sold by plaintiff to defendant and the other represents the price of furniture sold to defendant for $160, subject to credits totalling $95 paid without designation. There was judgment for plaintiff as prayed for.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Diamond v. WillettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Bamber v. MayeuxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  3. Voorhies v. HanceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API