Legal Opinion

Corning v. Troy Iron & Nail Factory

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment rendered at a special term, dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint without costs, and without prejudice to an action at law, to recover damages for the alleged 'diversion of the waters of the Wynantskill.

1Opinion of the CourtHogeboom, J.

This is a suit in equity brought by the plaintiffs to obtain an injunction against the defendants to restrain them from diverting the waters of the Wynantskill from their natural bed or channel through or along the lands of the plaintiffs, by means of a ditch or trunk or otherwise, and from drawing and using the same by means of such di*487version, and to compel the defendants to restore said waters to their natural bed or channel, and to pay the plaintiffs such damages as they have sustained by reason of such diversion ; and for general relief.

The title of the plaintiffs to lands along the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Corning v. Troy Iron & Nail FactoryNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Chalmers v. WrightThe Superior Court of New York City · 1866
  3. Brown v. AshleyNevada Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API