Legal Opinion · Dissent

Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 2006No. 101,572Published

1Dissent

EDMONDSON, J.,

Dissenting and joined by WATT, C.J. and COLBERT, J.

¶ 1 I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that our statutory physician’s lien is enforceable against UM coverage and would dissent solely for that reason, but this case has more basic and fundamental flaws which also must be addressed: the small claims court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to hear and determine this action to enforce a lien, and the purported lien was not perfected according to statute.

¶ 2 The question of subject matter jurisdiction is primary and fundamental in every case and it is the duty of this…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. Patterson v. BeallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. AMF Tubescope Company v. HatchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Riffe Petroleum Co. v. Great Nat. Corp., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Shaffer v. JefferySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API