Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Putnam

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1887No. Civil No. 206PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a Judgment of the District Court of the Second Judicial District in and for the County of Pinal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

The sheriff of Pinal county, in order to satisfy execution in his hands against C. D. Putnam, levied upon certain cattle on the range as the property of said defendant, and on the sixth day of April, 1886, gave notice of sale of all the right, title, and interest of said defendant therein. Thereafter, but before the satisfaction of said execution. J. D. Putnam filed this bill, alleging that himself and said defendant were co-partners, doing business in the firm name of Putnam Bros., grazing cattle at large on the Gila and San Pedro rivers; that the cattle were branded “P;” that defendant had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fisk v. HenarieOregon Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Gurney v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Territory of Arizona ex rel. Price v. DoanArizona Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API