Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice, & Attorney General Gonzales

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 31, 2007No. Docket 02-4882-agPublished

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

DENNIS JACOBS, Chief Judge, with whom JOSÉ A. CABRANES and REENA RAGGI, Circuit Judges,

concur, dissenting from the denial of rehearing in banc.

“A court may review a final order of removal only if ... the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies available to the alien as of right .... ” 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1). Thus Congress foreclosed our review of challenges that an alien failed to present at the agency’s factfind-ing and appellate levels. The majority of a divided panel says that we can reaeh unex-hausted issues nevertheless — subject only to our discretion and to the spongy test of…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Lin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API