Legal Opinion

S.S.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 2002No. 5D01-1054PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

S.S.M. was committed to a level 8, high-risk residential program. This commitment ignored the recommendations of the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).

A trial court may disregard the recommendations of the DJJ in a juvenile proceeding. See § 985.23(3)(c), Fla. Stat. (2001). However, when the recommendations are disregarded, the court must state the reasons for doing so, including making reference to the characteristics of the re*1235strictiveness level and the needs of the child. A.G. v. State, 737 So.2d 1244, 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). The reasons given for imposing a level 8 program here were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. K.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. G.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  3. T.N. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. C.M.L. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  5. K.R.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API