Legal Opinion

Simon v. Weigel

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 27, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Dubuque City Court. MOTION to admit a bill of exceptions signed by appellants attorneys as a part of the record.

1Opinion of the CourtLowe, C. J.

The motion is resisted, chiefly on the ground *506that the attorneys of the party taking the exceptions signed and certified the same after the judge refused to do so. The act approved January 25th 1855, authorizes two or more attorneys or officers of the court to sign bills of exceptions when the judge of the District Court shall have disallowed or refused the same. This act is susceptible of two constructions, and should be so interpreted as to carry out the intent of the legislature, without opening the door to evils equal to those intended to be remedied.

It is quite clear that to permit the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. KilduffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
  2. Thornily v. PierceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  3. St. John v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API