Craig v. Hesperia Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The court below granted a nonsuit, and judgment for defendant followed. Plaintiffs appeal, or have undertaken to appeal, from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. Respondent has submitted a motion to dismiss the appeal on several grounds; but, under our views of the case, it is unnecessary to pass upon that motion.
The main attack of appellants is upon the order granting the nonsuit. The only specification under the head of “ errors of law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the appellants” is that “ the court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a nonsuit.” But the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Warner v. DarrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. FaulkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Cravens v. DeweyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Schroeder v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Malone v. BeardsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Green v. DuvergeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Stow v. Superior Court of Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Craig v. Hesperia Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Hanna v. De GarmoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Estate of MagerlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.