Legal Opinion
M.K. Ex Rel. Mrs. K. v. Sergi
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 12, 2008No. 3:96CV00482 (WIG)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DCF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [# 230]
WILLIAM I. GARFINKEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Mrs. K., on behalf of and as next friend of her son, M.K., (collectively “plaintiffs”), has brought this action alleging that defendants violated the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1482; the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq.; § 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 794; and plaintiffs’ rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to United States…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lee v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Connecticut Office of Protection & Advocacy for Persons With Disabilities v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Genn ex rel. Genn v. New Haven Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
- Murphy ex rel. Murphy v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Bjs v. State Educ. department/university of NyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.