Legal Opinion

State v. Cornelius

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 1, 1898PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction. — Hon. David Muephy, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.

This is a proceeding by information by the prosecuting attorney of the St. Louis Court of Criminal Correction against the defendants for maintaining a nuisance and keeping a common gaming house. On motion of defendants the said information was quashed and the State has appealed to this court.

The State is restricted in its right of appeal to those ' cases in which'“an indictment is quashed, or adjudged insufficient upon demurrer or when judgment thereon is arrested.” R. S. 1889, sec. 4290. “Indictment” is a technical word and when used in the Constitution of this State and in our statutes must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex parte SlaterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  2. State v. KelmSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  3. State v. ClipperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  4. State v. CarrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HigginsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  3. State v. ThayerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. State v. BeaglesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. State v. RossMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API