Legal Opinion
Benson Tower Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Victaulic Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2017No. 15-35119UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Defendant-Appellant Victaulic Co. (Vic-taulic) appeals from the district court’s denial of its renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and its motion for a new trial. We affirm.
1. A jury verdict may be reversed for lack of substantial evidence only if the evidence “permits only one reasonable conclusion, and that conclusion is contrary to the jury’s verdict.” Pavao v. Pagay, 307 F.3d 915, 918 (9th Cir. 2002). Here, substantial evidence supported the jury’s determination that Victaulic’s defective products caused damage to Benson Tower Condominium Owners Association’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Pomona v. Sqm North America CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Estate of Henry Barabin v. Astenjohnson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Linda Messick v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Dr. Erik Natkin, DO PC v. American Osteopathic AssociationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- WATM LLC v. Payment Alliance International IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025