Legal Opinion

Houghton v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 4, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFish, J.

The question in issue is whether defendant Grimes can maintain his suit at law, brought against the Central New Hampshire Power Company of Maine in the Windham County Court, to recover the amount of certain certificates of indebtedness of said company payable to him. The plaintiffs in the instant suit are Frederick L. Houghton and a large number of individuals belonging with him to a voluntary association known as the Frederick L. Houghton and Associates, the said power company, and the Central Light and Power Company of Massachusetts.

The findings of the chancellor disclose the following…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Kelly v. Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  3. Walker v. WaitSupreme Court of Vermont · 1878
  4. Brigham v. DanaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
  5. Town of Bennington v. Fillmore & SladeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Penrod Drilling Company v. Sam H. Johnson and James L. StarnesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. White River Chair Co. v. Connecticut River Power Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  3. Houghton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1930
  4. Duplis v. RUTLAND AERIE, NO. 1001, ETC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  5. Utley v. School District of WoodburySupreme Court of Vermont · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API