State v. Frelinghuysen
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the district court for Bamsey county, where the action was tried before Wilkin, J., and a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
The defendant was indicted for. the crime of receiv*266ing stolen property. At her trial one Casey was called as a juror, and challenged by the defence for actual bias. Upon the voir dire the defendant’s counsel disclosed the fact that the proposed juror had, through a newspaper article, learned the business of the defendant, which was that, of keeping a house of ill-fame. Casey was then asked, more than once, whether his knowledge of the character of the business in which defendant was engaged had created a prejudice in his mind so that he could not sit in the trial of the. case at bar as an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- State v. LawlorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- Corrigan v. ElsingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- State v. KnudsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
- Powell v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Mullen v. DevenneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Wadman v. Trout Lake Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.