Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Muncrief
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice
Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and means such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Fouch v. State, Alcoholic Beverage Control Div., 10 Ark. App. 139, 662 S.W.2d 181 (1983). I dissent because the Board’s decision to deny Muncriefs transfer application lacks supporting evidence. The evidence introduced in opposition to Muncriefs application included the testimony of Shirley Janisse, a competing convenience store operator with a beer permit, who testified that Muncriefs proposed move would put her out of business because Muncriefs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fouch v. State, Alcoholic Beverage Control Div.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
- Fayetteville School District No. 1 v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983