Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arkansas Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Muncrief

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 24, 1992No. 91-295Published

1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice

Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla and means such evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Fouch v. State, Alcoholic Beverage Control Div., 10 Ark. App. 139, 662 S.W.2d 181 (1983). I dissent because the Board’s decision to deny Muncriefs transfer application lacks supporting evidence. The evidence introduced in opposition to Muncriefs application included the testimony of Shirley Janisse, a competing convenience store operator with a beer permit, who testified that Muncriefs proposed move would put her out of business because Muncriefs…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fouch v. State, Alcoholic Beverage Control Div.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1983
  2. Fayetteville School District No. 1 v. Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API