Bliss v. Linden Cemetery Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from the court of chancery. See opinion of that court, 90 N. J. Eq. 404.
1Per curiam
The only cpiestion raised relates solely to the priority of payment of allowances awarded to the receiver, the- amount of which is not questioned, for operating expenses-, services and counsel fees out of moneys collected in two ways — first, by sales of lots, pursuant to the cemetery scheme, under which the receiver has operated the cemetery as a going- concern; seconclty, out of the proceeds of sale, of land of the insolvent cemetery corporation to a railroad company. The scheme, as noted in previous reports’of this litigation (Bliss v. Cemetery Association, 85 N. J. Eq. 501; S. C., 89 N.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Albert Kernahan v. Franklin ArmsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931
- GARDEN OF MEM. v. Forest Lawn Mem. Pk. Assn.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Seidler v. Branford Restaurant, Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Laudan v. ABC Travel System, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Supreme Fuel v. Peerless PlushNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.