Legal Opinion

Aragon v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 25, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00438Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AUGUSTINE ARAGON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-00438-BEN 3:17-cr-01068-BEN-1 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CORRECT SENTENCE BUT 15 Respondent. STRIKING CONDITIONS OF SUPERVISED RELEASE 4, 5, AND 16 13 17 [ECF Nos. 89, 92, 95] 18 19 Petitioner Augustine Aragon moves under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(“Section 2255”) to 20 Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence. ECF No. 89.1 For the reasons discussed 21 below, the motion is DENIED.2 22 23 1 In reviewing Petitioner’s…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API