Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 17, 1989No. 86-3118PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Hector Sanchez asserts that the trial court committed reversible error by restricting Sanchez’s right to cross-examine the state’s key witness, Carlos Camacho, during Sanchez’s trial on charges of first-degree murder, armed robbery, and trafficking in cocaine. The jury convicted Sanchez of the lesser included offenses of third-degree murder without a firearm and robbery without a firearm. For the following reasons, we affirm Sanchez’s conviction and sentence.

Sanchez’s theory of defense was that Camacho had portrayed Sanchez as the mastermind and triggerman in the robbery-homicide in order to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Ciccarelli v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Swain v. SingletaryDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999
  2. Pena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API