Legal Opinion
In re AMR Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 22, 2013No. 11-15463 (SHL)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
SEAN H. LANE, Bankruptcy Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion of Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. for an Order Deeming its Proof of Claim Timely Filed Pursuant to Rule 9006(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure and Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (ECF No. 5215) (the “Motion”). Movant asserts that it did not receive actual notice of the bar date setting the deadline for filing claims in the above-captioned Chapter 11 cases, and therefore the Court should deem its proof of claim as timely, even thought it was filed more than three months after the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- In Re: Enron Corp. Midland Cogeneration Venture Limited Partnership v. Enron Corp., the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re GreenbergUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- In re Motors Liquidation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- In re Queen Elizabeth Realty Corp.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- In re Manhattan Jeep Chrysler Dodge, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2019
- In re SpenlinhauerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2017
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.