Legal Opinion

Helring v. Delaware & Hudson Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 7, 1931No. 81Published

1Opinion of the CourtChase, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

The action of the trial court in refusing to submit this case to the jury requires the rights of these parties to be determined on the basis of Helring’s having been killed without warning by defendant’s engine when operated with no lookout at a time when Helring was on the defendant’s right of way because he chose to go there in the performance of the duties of his employment, although there was no necessity for his being there at all. Granted that his inquiry of Davis was necessary and that he had to go to Davis to make it, there was still no need for him…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Heskell v. Auburn Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. McCarthy v. New York, N. H. & H. R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
  4. Hoyer v. Central R. Co. of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  5. Cronopolous v. Pennsylvania Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API