Legal Opinion

Zuckerbrow v. Lombardy Dresses Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtColden, J.

Motion by plaintiff for leave to discontinue this action.

*40Defendant Lombardy Dresses Inc., opposes the application on the ground that it is a subterfuge to obtain a change of venue. Plaintiff, who is a resident of Queens County, originally commenced this action in Kings County. Defendant corporations have their offices in New York County. The moving defendant, pursuant to rule 146 of the Rules of Civil Practice, demanded that the venue be changed to Queens County. When plaintiff failed to consent, said defendant made a motion for such relief, which motion was granted. On the settlement of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Janssen v. WhitlockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chanler v. LyonsNew York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API