Allen v. Stracener
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
Appellant sued for damages for personal injuries resulting from gunshot wounds inflicted by appellee. Upon the filing of his complaint he obtained a writ of garnishment against a Morrilton bank. This appeal is from the circuit court’s order dissolving the writ. The question presented' is one of first impression: Is a writ of garnishment obtainable as a matter of course before judgment in a tort action against a resident of this State?
Appellant relies principally upon Ark. Stats. (1947), § 31-501, reading in part: “In all cases where any plaintiff may begin an action in any court of record . .…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Missouri Pacific R.R. Co. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Giles v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. BoundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
- Standard Lumber Company v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Leingardt v. DeitzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Company v. Citizens National Bank of West HollywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Lawrence v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- McGill v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Clinical Study Centers, Inc. v. BoellnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- G.A.C. Trans-World Acceptance Corp. v. Jaynes Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.