Legal Opinion

Allen v. Stracener

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1949No. 4-8666PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

Appellant sued for damages for personal injuries resulting from gunshot wounds inflicted by appellee. Upon the filing of his complaint he obtained a writ of garnishment against a Morrilton bank. This appeal is from the circuit court’s order dissolving the writ. The question presented' is one of first impression: Is a writ of garnishment obtainable as a matter of course before judgment in a tort action against a resident of this State?

Appellant relies principally upon Ark. Stats. (1947), § 31-501, reading in part: “In all cases where any plaintiff may begin an action in any court of record . .…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific R.R. Co. v. McLendonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  2. Giles v. HicksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1885
  3. Sinclair Refining Co. v. BoundsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  4. Standard Lumber Company v. HenrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Leingardt v. DeitzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Company v. Citizens National Bank of West HollywoodCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Lawrence v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. McGill v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Clinical Study Centers, Inc. v. BoellnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  5. G.A.C. Trans-World Acceptance Corp. v. Jaynes Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API