Bank of California v. Shaber
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of mandamus to Win. It. Shaber, Treasurer, etc.
1DissentB.oss, J.
I dissent. I think the writ should be denied, for the reason that we cannot, in this proceeding, treat the appeal taken by the City and County Attorney as a nullity. In my opinion, how*328ever, when the Board of Supervisors directed the judgment that had been recovered by Smith against the City and County of San Francisco to be paid, it was, in effect, an ending of the controversy, and a determination by that body not to take an appeal from the judgment. And I think it cannot be doubted that the Board of Supervisors had the power to stop the litigation by directing payment of the judgment, rather…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. . Supervisors of Greene Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Board of Supervisors v. BowenNew York Supreme Court · 1871
- El Dorado County v. ElstnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- People ex rel. Central National Bank v. FitzgeraldNew York Supreme Court · 1877