Legal Opinion

Phinney v. Trustees of the Sheppard & Enoch Pratt Hospital

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 21, 1898PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a decree of the Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City (Sharp, J.).

1Opinion of the CourtMcSherry, C. J.

Having decided in the preceding case that no trust was, or was intended to be, created by the residuary clause of Mr. Pratt’s will, it remains for us now to consider the contention of the alternative residuary legatees and devisees. This contention is that the Act of Assembly of 1898, ch. if, changing the name of the Sheppard Asylum to the Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital is unconstitutional and void; that consequently the condition upon the happening of which the property disposed of by the residuary clause was to vest in the Sheppard Asylum, did not come to pass, and that therefore the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Williams v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  4. Regents of the University of Maryland v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1838
  5. State v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Coleman v. SherrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  2. Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
  4. Hogan v. Hall, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  5. Bond v. M. C.C. of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API