Legal Opinion
Board of Adjustment v. Stovall
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided February 11, 1949No. 14931PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDonald, Chief Justice.
At a former day this appeal was dismissed. Board of Adjustment v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 211 S.W.2d 303. The Supreme Court set aside our order of dismissal and remanded the case to us for decision on the merits. Id., 216 S.W.2d 171.
The City of Fort Worth has in effect a zoning ordinance, enacted under authority of Acts 1927, 40th Leg., ch. 283, p. 424, Articles 1011a — lOllj, Vern.Tex.Civ.St. The ordinance provides for a board of adjustment, as authorized by Article lOllg.
Interstate Circuit, Inc., applied to the city building commissioner for a permit to build an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- B'd of Adj'm't of City of Ft. Worth v. StovallTexas Supreme Court · 1949
- Texas Consol. Theatres, Inc. v. PittilloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Scaduto v. Town of BloomfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
- Board of Adjustment v. StovallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
3Cited by25 opinions
- MODDY v. City of University ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Nelson v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Swain v. Board of Adjustment of City of Univ. ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
- West Texas Water Refiners, Inc. v. S & B Beverage Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- Southern National Bank of Houston v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.