Rutledge v. Vanmeter
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 66 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Ms. Op., September 21, 1871, Oheekes v. McCoy. 4 Metcalfe, 30, Bondurant v. Apperson. 6 B. Monroe, 141, McGrath v. Balser. 1 Metcalfe, 397, Short v. Tinsley. CITED Act of March 10, 1856. 2 Met. 458-60, Proctor v. Conway. 15 B. Mon. 630, Harris v. Ray. 4 Met. 93, Meadows v. Turpin. 1 Morehead & Brown’s Statutes, section 27, page 300. Civil Code, sections 159, 373, 579, 581, 582.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE HARDIN
delivered the opinion of the court.
On the 7th day of September, 1863, Stephen Bradley and his wife conveyed to James Rutledge three parcels of land, containing together about ninety acres, for the expressed consideration of twenty-five hundred dollars, the payment of which was acknowledged in the deed. Afterward, on the 3d day of March, 1864, B. F. Vanmeter brought this suit against Bradley, Rutledge, and others, exhibiting a judgment in his favor against Bradley, and the return of an execution issued thereon indorsed “no property found,” the judgment having been rendered on a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Givens v. WheelerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1882
- Horton v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- Joyes v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
- Metropolitan Trust Co. v. TracyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Fearon Lumber & Veneer Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.