Ten Ten Lincoln Place, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for judgment declaring that defendant’s service classifications in its filed tariff schedule or rate schedule are discriminatory, violative of the Public Service Law, the common law and the Constitutions of the United States and the State of New York, judgment dismissing the complaint unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion the issues presented must he passed upon by the Public Service Commission in the first instance and not by the courts. (Matter of Leitner v. New York Telephone Co., 277 N. Y. 180; Purcell v. New York Central R. R. Co., 268 N. Y.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. Puritan Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Matter of Leitner v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Purcell v. New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Murray v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Murray v. . New York Telephone CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Campo Corp. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Cardone v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1949
- County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Columbia Gas of New York, Inc. v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.