Legal Opinion

Bonneville v. City of Alpena

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1909No. Docket No. 120PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Alpena; Emerick, J. Case by Antoine E. Bonneville against the city of Alpena for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Chisholm is a paved street in the city of Alpena. Bertrand, the owner of a house on the east side of said street, being desirous of connecting the same with the sewer, which was near the curb on the opposite side of the street, employed a plumber to do the work. To do this, Maynard, the plumber, employed men and opened a ditch part way across the street, having first obtained permission to do so from the street commissioner, whom he notified of his intention a day or so before he began work. The trench was left open by Maynard’s men without placing lights to indicate danger. Early in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of West Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Wright v. City of MuskegonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Salvati v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Cox v. City of Dearborn HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Wechsler v. Wayne County Road CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Zyskowski v. HabelmannMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API