Bedell v. Baltimore & O. R.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
At Law. Separate actions by Edward S. Bedell, by Jennie Flick, and by George Robertson against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. On motions to remand.
1Opinion of the Court
WFSTENHAVER, District Judge.
These three cases are before me on plaintiffs’ motion to remand and involve the same question. All the original petitions stated causes of action properly removable to this court. The injuries for which each plaintiff sought to recover were not alleged to have been sustained while the respective plaintiffs and' defendants were engaged in an act of interstate commerce, but, on the contrary, such facts as are alleged show that they were not so engaged.
In the Bedell case the summons was served July 17th. It was returnable July 23, 1917. The answer day was August 11,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Barney v. LathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Wabash Railroad v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Ullrich v. New York, N. H. & H. R.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
- Strother v. Union Pac. R.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Texas Employers Ins. Ass'n v. FeltCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
- Grubbs v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- National Labor Relations Board v. Atlanta Metallic Casket Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- First National Bank v. SorensonWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.