Legal Opinion

Odum v. McArthur

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 16, 1925No. 4471PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. The motion for new trial complains that the court illegally admitted, to the jury, over the objection of the movant, certain testimony of the plaintiff, as follows: “My father knew about my going into possession of it, and he knew of all these improvements that I made, and [speaking of cutting the timber] he, my father, knew about it, and he made no objection that I know of.” It was error to admit the above evidence over the objection that plaintiff was testifying as to a transaction with his deceased father, whose administratrix was the defendant, with regard to the issue involved in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Garrick v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Hill v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Parker v. SalmonsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Stiles v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mickle v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  2. North v. TolbertCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Odum v. McArthurSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API