C.J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I,. INTRODUCTION
C.J. appeals the decision of the superior court to terminate his parental rights. The superior court found that C.J.'s children were in need of aid, that the state had made active efforts to reunify C.J. with his children, and that placement with C.J. was likely to result in serious physical or emotional damage to the children. Because the state did not produce evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that placement of the children with C.J. is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the children, and because the state did not make…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re the Adoption of T.N.F.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- A.B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- In re J.R.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Lucy J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Jon S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Marcia v. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Ben M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.