Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Doubleday

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by James 0. Doubleday and another, as administrators, from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Otsego, entered in the office of said Surrogate’s Court on the 23d day of November, 1915, upholding and allowing respondent’s claim to the extent of $1,334.50, with costs.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

Julia L. Sutliff presented a claim to the administrators of the estate of James D. Clyde, deceased, for the sum of $3,374.54, with interest on $400 of this amount from January 29, 1912, this claim being based upon eight different items. This claim was duly rejected by the administrators and a stipulation was made that it might be heard on the final accounting. Passing over the matters of practice, the administrators petitioned for *740the judicial settlement of their account, and an answer, filed in behalf of the claimant, set up that the personal property belonging to the estate was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kearney v. . McKeonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of DoleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  3. Porter v. RhoadesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Pollock v. LandisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LongNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of WilsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1976
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of SpauldingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. State v. TowleNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API