Pacific Coast Fruit Distributors, Inc., a Corporation v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
The question presented is whether the appellee railroad is entitled to collect freight transportation charges from one, who, as selling agent of a shipper and not a party to the original shipping document (i. e., bill-of-lading), is substituted as consignee and assumes control of a shipment by reconsigning it to other consignees and destinations.
The Court below said: Yes. We agree. The agreed statement of facts shows that R. T. Fleischer & Company of Mexico delivered certain shipments of tomatoes to Southern Pacific Railroad Company of Mexico consigned to itself at…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Southern Coal, Coke & Mining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ingram Barge Co., LLC v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- EIMSKIP v. Atlantic Fish Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Evans Products Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Milos Product Tanker Corporation v. Valero Marketing and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Hall Lumber Sales, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.