Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Fruit Distributors, Inc., a Corporation v. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 8, 1954No. 13916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODMAN, District Judge.

The question presented is whether the appellee railroad is entitled to collect freight transportation charges from one, who, as selling agent of a shipper and not a party to the original shipping document (i. e., bill-of-lading), is substituted as consignee and assumes control of a shipment by reconsigning it to other consignees and destinations.

The Court below said: Yes. We agree. The agreed statement of facts shows that R. T. Fleischer & Company of Mexico delivered certain shipments of tomatoes to Southern Pacific Railroad Company of Mexico consigned to itself at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Southern Coal, Coke & Mining Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1929

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ingram Barge Co., LLC v. Zen-Noh Grain Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
  2. EIMSKIP v. Atlantic Fish Market, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Evans Products Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  4. Milos Product Tanker Corporation v. Valero Marketing and Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. Hall Lumber Sales, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API