Legal Opinion

Hebert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1992No. 91-1344PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

600 So.2d 1293 (1992)

Christopher HEBERT and Lawrence Byrd, Appellants,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-1344.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 25, 1992.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Abel Gomez, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellants.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Charles T. Faircloth, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

WIGGINTON, Judge.

We affirm the trial court's orders of restitution in the amount of $2530 imposed as conditions of appellants' probation, agreeing with the state that it carried its burden of proving the amount of loss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Hoover v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Peralta v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  5. L.A.R. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hebert v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. State v. WhetzelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Triplett v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Carson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API