Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

H. T. Coker Construction Co. v. Whitfield Transportation, Inc.

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1974No. 1236Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSutin, Judge

I concur on the first shipment and dissent on the second shipment. The judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.

First Shipment

The plaintiff’s first contention is that the trial court erred in concluding:

That the plaintiff failed to exercise due diligence in inspecting the merchandise received on September 3j 1971, and described on Exhibit “A”, and therefore Plaintiff should not be entitled to recovery on Count I of the First Amended Complaint. (Tr. 62) [Emphasis added]

“It is fundamental that a judgment cannot be sustained on appeal, unless the conclusion on which it rests finds support…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galvan v. MillerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Whitney Manuf. Co. v. Richmond, R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  3. Langdon v. JaramilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Chavez v. GribbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Kingman St. Louis Implement Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API