Clement v. Rainey
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the ease as above).
It is insisted that the adjudications of the county court of December 24, 1921, and February 18, 1924, that the testator, II. A. Clement, was of unsound mind were conclusive of the fact that he was not competent to make the will of February 16, 1924, in question here. But the rule is otherwise. “A person,” said the writer of the article on “Wills” in 28 R. C. L. 100, “who, in lunacy proceedings, has been adjudged to be of unsound mind is not necessarily incompetent to make a will although such adjudication is not set aside. One’s mental powers may be so far…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
- Evans v. Allen, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
- Stephen v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Reilly v. BirminghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- American Employers' Ins. Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.