Legal Opinion

H.M.K. v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Steinhardt, J.), dated February 28, 2000, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) to change the venue of the action from the Supreme Court, Kings County, to the Supreme Court, Queens County.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the defendants’ motion to change the venue of the action pursuant to CPLR 510 (3) *368(see, Miszko v Leeds & Morelli, 269 AD2d 372; Schlegel v Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 258 AD2d 576; Mallory v Long…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mallory v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Miszko v. Leeds & MorelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API