Legal Opinion
Besack v. Rouselle Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 15, 1989No. Civ. A. 86-0572PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
O’NEILL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Besack, a Pennsylvania citizen, filed this action alleging that he was injured while operating a punch press in the course and scope of his employment with Pennsbury Manufacturing Company. 1 Besack sought damages for medical expenses, wage loss, and pain, suffering and humiliation from the manufacturer of the punch press, Rouselle Corporation, a citizen of Illinois. At the time of the accident, Pennsbury received workmen’s compensation insurance coverage from Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company; and Rouselle was insured under a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sands v. Pa. Ins. Guaranty Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Lucas v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Bullock v. PariserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. TraboshDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
- Fritsche v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
- Washington Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
- Reliance Insurance Co. in Liquidation v. Aramark Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- R.I. Insurers' Insolvency v. New Prime, PcSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.