Legal Opinion

McGarr v. Hayford

District Court, S.D. California

Decided May 12, 1971No. Civ. No. 70-33PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

THOMPSON, District Judge.

This matter came on for hearing upon defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend the complaint. At the conclusion of the hearing the matter was submitted to the court for decision.

FACTS

This complaint was originally filed on February 5, 1970, by the plaintiff acting *220in propria persona. Plaintiff was seeking money damages for legal malpractice against Robert H. Parker, an attorney licensed by and a citizen of the State of California, and Andrew O. Hayford, an attorney licensed by and a citizen of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. King v. MordowanecDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  4. Kenney v. FoxDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1955
  5. United States v. 64.88 Acres of LandDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re RidingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  2. SCOA Industries, Inc. v. Kennedy & Cohen, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  3. Span-Deck, Inc. v. Fabcon, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
  4. In Re AucoinDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
  5. Brimstone Export Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API